Banning Foreigners Versus Banning Assault Weapons

35 Questions

This is part 20 in a series of 35 questions. It is based on a series of questions answered by John Hawkins for here, and here.

20. Why are you more comfortable with banning foreigners than banning assault weapons?

Assault weapons are inanimate objects. An assault weapon never hurt anyone all by itself. It takes a human being to use it for violence. And while humans are generally wicked at heart, they use assault rifles in an incredibly small number of crimes. Unfortunately, when they do, the results tend to be horrific. Similarly, many people are afraid to fly because of the horrific impact airline crashes have on us. Yet, people generally have no qualms with getting into a vehicle even though it’s much more dangerous to drive than fly.

Further, people have a Constitutional right to bear arms. It doesn’t matter whether anyone likes it.

The foreigner’s issue is a little tougher. First, let me say that there is no Constitutional right for foreigners to have access to this country. We can let in as many or little as we want.

Second, no one is looking to ban foreigners. We just want to be more selective–and smarter–about who we let in. We want to keep criminals, and terrorists, out. We also want to keep people out that are not going to assimilate to American values. That doesn’t mean abandoning your heritage and family history, but it does mean you have to understand, and accept, that Americans have the right to keep and bear arms. They also have the right to Free Speech, even if that speech offends you.

On a separate note, I find the idea that someone thought it was a good idea to lump human beings into the same category as an inanimate object, or tool, a little disturbing. I don’t find it surprising coming from a liberal, but yes, disturbing.

Related Posts:

Legislating Gun Violence Won’t End Gun Violence

Gun cartridges on a reflective surface

On February 14, 2018, a lone gunman entered Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, FL and killed 17 students. Despite the mistakes by local police and the FBI prior to that day, it is gun control that has been on everyone’s mind. Why is there so little blame being placed on the gunman? Do you remember his name?

Disconnect Between the Person and the Weapon

I find it interesting, and sad, that people seem to have forgotten the name of the man who killed 17 students. While I’m certainly not into memorializing people for these types of actions, I do think it’s a little too soon to have forgotten. I admit, I had to look it up, but we’ve been so focused on guns, forgetting wasn’t tough to do. Unfortunately, we’ve been so focused on guns, I can’t help wonder, why is that man in jail if the gun is at fault?

People who are overly interested in gun control seem to have this disconnect between the person and the tool used. Taking away the tool isn’t, or wasn’t, going to change that man’s mind. He was most likely in a state that he was looking for the most efficient way, but if he didn’t have the tool, he could easily have killed just as many or more by building a homemade bomb, or driving his vehicle through the parking as classes are letting out.

The “Assault Rifle” Phobia

The word phobia gets tossed around a lot, but I think that it’s actually fitting in this case. It seems that the “assault rifle” is kind of like a boogeyman. It’s scary, but the truth is much less frightening than reality.

It turns out that big, scary military rifles don’t kill the vast majority of the 11,000 Americans murdered with guns each year. Little handguns do1.

There are millions of these things in the hands of private law-abiding citizens, yet it’s only used a fraction of what they could be. Even when they are, the numbers aren’t as scary as other types of murder weapons: handguns, knives, blunt objects such as hammers, or even personal objects such as fists and feet2!

I liken the anti-assault rifle movement to someone afraid to fly in an airplane because the number of people that die all at once is traumatic; and it is! But it doesn’t change the fact that airplanes are safe. While guns may not be safe, the reaction is ironically very similar: irrational.

Violence Will Exist Regardless of Weapon Legislation

People don’t take into account the way that human beings are wired: we’re evil! Obviously, there are varying degrees of how our evil plays out in society, but we’re all evil to a certain extent.

And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone (Luke 18:19 ESV).

I understand that the non-Christian would have trouble following this line of thinking, but this is grade school catechism for most Christians. Simply reading through your Bible front to back once in your life should be enough to gain this perspective, but even Christians seem more willing to blame guns than individuals.

So, it’s time to treat this with a little common sense, particularly from those who call themselves Christians. We need to see gun violence for what it is: another symptom of a fallen world that won’t be fixed by taking away a tool. Legislating gun control isn’t going to make gun violence go away. Evil will still exist in the world, just as it has since Cain killed Abel. We’ve been legislating violence in various forms for ages, and it’s failed miserably.

That doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be punishment for individuals that commit such acts, but we should be focused on the individual and not the tool. The fact of the matter is, we already have laws against killing other human beings, and it doesn’t stop people. Gun control won’t stop people. Our best course of action is to bring God back into the discussion, as well as the dignity of human beings.

Apparently, the man who killed 17 people in Parkland, FL had no friends. No one talked to him. I wonder, were there no Christians in his life?

In the News:

Enfield shooting: Student shot and stabbed to death as London sees five murders in five days. Evening Standard. 19 Mar 2018. Accessed: 19 Mar 2018. Web.
Mass Killing In South Carolina Goes Unreported By National Media. Bearing Arms. 15 Mar 2018. Accessed: 15 Mar 2018. Web.

  1. Beckett, Lois. The Assault Weapon Myth. The New York Times. 12 Sep 2014. Accessed: 19 Mar 2018. Web. 

  2. 2016 Crime in the United States. FBI: Uniform Crime Reporting. Accessed: 19 mar 2018. Web. 

Related Posts:

Cross-posted on Medium

Left Pushes Anti-Human Policies; Surprised When Gunman Shoots Up School

Everyone is looking for a reason behind the massacre at Sandy Hook. They want to know how this happened, and why this happened, and they want to know how to fix it. They’re looking at gun control, mental health, violent video games, and movies. They’re looking for some cause to blame; a cause to get rid of. While mental health is certainly a place to look because it deals with individuals, it is not the cause. Everyone is looking in the wrong place. Continue reading “Left Pushes Anti-Human Policies; Surprised When Gunman Shoots Up School”

Gun Control Has Failed, Again

On Friday, 26 people were murdered; 20 of which were children.

I have no idea what those children look like yet, but I am continually saddened as I think of what their faces may have looked like; eyes wide with fear, crying, begging… I wonder what the shooter was thinking as he looked into each little terror-stricken face. And pulled the trigger. And then did it again. And again. Until 20 children lay dead. I am saddened each time I think of it.

I can’t help but wonder what each child was thinking as they watched a madman murder each of their classmates one by one. Maybe they were thinking, why won’t somebody make it stop? And then, my sadness turns to anger. Why the hell __didn’t__ anyone make him stop? Why was he allowed to murder this nations children, one by one. At his leisure? I’ll tell you why. Because there wasn’t anyone there to stop him. There wasn’t anyone there capable of stopping him. There wasn’t anyone there with a gun. Continue reading “Gun Control Has Failed, Again”